Skip to main content
Cancer Explained
Donate
Beginner 7 min readEditorial review complete

Does Laetrile (Vitamin B17) Cure Cancer?

Laetrile, sold as 'vitamin B17,' is promoted as a natural cancer cure. Here is what studies show — and why it can be dangerous.

NCI source

National Cancer Institute — Laetrile/Amygdalin (PDQ)

A woman wearing a headscarf talks with two female clinicians
A woman wearing a headscarf talks with two female clinicians

Key fact

Laetrile ('vitamin B17,' amygdalin) is promoted as a natural cancer cure.

The short answer

Laetrile, marketed as 'vitamin B17' or amygdalin, has shown little anticancer effect in studies and is not approved by the FDA. It is not actually a vitamin. It can release cyanide in the body and has caused cyanide poisoning. Cancer authorities do not recommend it, and relying on it instead of proven treatment is risky.

  • Laetrile ('vitamin B17,' amygdalin) is promoted as a natural cancer cure.

  • It is not a vitamin, and studies have shown little to no anticancer effect.

  • It is not approved by the FDA as a cancer treatment.

  • Laetrile can release cyanide in the body and has caused cyanide poisoning.

Choose how you want to understand this

The full explanation.

What people are actually being handed

Often it is a bag of bitter apricot seeds; sometimes it is a bottle labeled "vitamin B17." A simple substance from fruit pits kills cancer cells and spares healthy ones, the pitch goes, and drug companies buried it because nobody can patent a seed. All you have to do is take it.

It is a good story, almost every part of it is wrong, and some of the wrong parts can hurt you.

What the stuff in the bag really is

Amygdalin is a real compound, found in the pits of apricots and peaches, in bitter almonds, and in other plants. Laetrile is a partly man-made version of it. The two names get used as though they mean the same thing, and in everyday conversation they mostly do.

The name "vitamin B17" was invented by a promoter, E.T. Krebs Jr. The committee that officially names vitamins never accepted it. The National Cancer Institute is blunt about this. There is no evidence that laetrile is needed for normal body chemistry, and no evidence that it acts as a vitamin in animals or in people.

Calling it a vitamin was marketing, not science, and that label did enormous work. A vitamin sounds both safe and necessary. A cyanide-releasing plant compound does not.

The cyanide part is not a scare tactic

When amygdalin breaks down it releases hydrogen cyanide. This is ordinary chemistry, not rhetoric. An enzyme called beta-glucosidase splits the molecule into cyanide, benzaldehyde, and sugar.

The original theory was tidy. Tumors were said to be loaded with beta-glucosidase and short of rhodanese, the enzyme that clears cyanide, so the poison would fire inside the tumor and be mopped up everywhere else. It did not survive testing.

How you take it changes the danger considerably. Swallowed laetrile is far more likely to poison you, because bacteria in your gut carry the enzyme that frees the cyanide, while injected laetrile releases much less. Animal work shows this directly. Rats raised germ-free had no ill effects and normal blood cyanide, while ordinary rats given the same compound became sluggish and had seizures.

Some everyday foods make it worse. NCI specifically names raw almonds, certain fruits and vegetables, and high-dose vitamin C. In an early NCI study, two patients who ate raw almonds while taking laetrile by mouth developed signs of cyanide poisoning.

The reported harms are not minor. NCI's list runs from nausea, vomiting, headache and dizziness through dangerously low blood pressure, liver damage, nerve damage that makes walking difficult, fever, confusion, coma, and death.

What happened when someone tested it

This is the part the suppression story leaves out. Laetrile was not ignored; it was studied with public money, by the very agency accused of hiding it.

NCI ran animal studies across many tumor types. None of the solid tumors or leukemias responded at any dose tested, and survival did not improve in any treated group.

NCI then went looking at the testimonials themselves, reviewing 67 case reports from laetrile users. Two looked like complete responses and four showed tumors shrinking. That was thin, but it was not nothing, so NCI funded a human trial.

Charles Moertel and colleagues published it in 1982, using the routine laetrile practitioners actually followed: amygdalin by vein for 21 days, then pills, plus vitamins, pancreatic enzymes, and a set diet. There were 175 patients assessed, most with breast, colon, or lung cancer.

One patient had a partial response, and it lasted ten weeks. By the end of the intravenous course, 54 percent already had cancer that was measurably growing, and seven months after treatment ended every patient's cancer had grown. About one in five reported feeling better for a while, though for most that feeling did not hold. Blood cyanide levels rose during the oral phase.

That is not a buried result. That is a result.

Where the law landed

The FDA has never approved laetrile for cancer. An application to study it as a new drug was accepted in 1970 and then rejected, court fights followed, and more than 20 states legalized it anyway. In 1980 the Supreme Court upheld the federal ban on shipping it between states. It cannot legally be sold in the UK or Europe either.

It never went away. Most of it is now manufactured in Mexico, outside FDA oversight, and that has consequences you cannot see in a capsule. Labels have been documented as wrong, and samples have been found contaminated with bacteria and other substances. You do not really know your dose, which matters enormously for something that releases a poison.

The FDA still acts against sellers. In 2021 it warned a company selling bitter apricot seeds, amygdalin extract and a product called Laetrile B17, over claims that B17 kills harmful cells and controls cancer.

Why kind, intelligent people still pass it along

Because the appeal is real, and it is not foolish.

Cancer strips away control, and laetrile hands some back. It is cheap, and you can buy it yourself today without anyone's permission. The story even explains why your doctor says no, which converts that "no" into proof rather than a warning. And it usually arrives from someone who is frightened for you and desperate to do something useful. That is not a bad motive.

Testimonials feel like evidence because they are about actual people, but a story cannot separate the remedy from everything else going on. Most people who take laetrile also had surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation; some cancers move slowly; a few behave strangely on their own. Trials exist precisely because a story cannot sort that out.

The harm worth saying out loud

Cyanide poisoning is the obvious risk, and it is not the biggest one.

The biggest harm is time. Treatments that work often work best early, so weeks spent on apricot seeds are weeks a treatable cancer keeps growing. This harm is silent. Nobody feels it happening, and it shows up later, on a scan.

You can say that to a relative without starting a fight. Begin with "I know you are trying to help," then hand them something real to do — a ride, a meal, a seat beside you during infusion.

How to check a claim like this one

Three questions do most of the work.

Was it ever actually tested? Search the name plus "PDQ" at cancer.gov, where NCI keeps summaries on alternative cancer treatments, including the ones that failed.

Does the cover-up story survive a look at the dates? Laetrile's own history breaks it, because the agency accused of hiding the cure is the one that paid for the trial.

Who profits? FDA warning letters are public, so search the product name at fda.gov. The sentences quoted back at a company are often the exact ones that first convinced you.

If you are already taking it, tell your oncologist — not to ask permission. They need to know, because cyanide affects lab results and can interact with other things you take.

Sources

Words to know

Tap any term to see what it means.

Browse the full glossary →

A man reads a document with printed charts at a home kitchen table

Common questions

Is laetrile a vitamin?

No. Despite the name 'vitamin B17,' laetrile is not a vitamin. It is a form of amygdalin found in fruit pits and nuts.

Does laetrile cure cancer?

Studies have shown little to no anticancer effect, and it is not FDA-approved. Cancer authorities do not recommend it as a treatment.

Is laetrile dangerous?

It can be. Amygdalin can release cyanide in the body, and there have been cases of cyanide poisoning. Relying on it instead of proven treatment is also risky.

Why is it still promoted?

The 'suppressed natural cure' story and the vitamin label make it appealing, and testimonials spread online — but these are not scientific evidence.

Questions to ask your doctor

Being prepared helps you get the most out of your appointments. Save or print these questions.

Open my question list

Tap a question to save it to your list (kept on this device).

Your next step

What the evidence shows about common cancer claims.

Explore more claim checks
Human Connection Layer

Speak With Trained Specialists & Human Navigators

Cancer Explained provides educational guidance, but does not replace trained specialists, social workers, or your medical team.

Free & Confidential

Talk to a trained cancer information specialist

Free, confidential assistance from NCI Cancer Information Service via phone, chat, or email.

Contact your oncology team

Locate after-hours contact numbers, portal messages, or urgent triage phone lines.

Find a patient navigator

Get one-on-one help with appointments, logistics, translation, and care coordination.

Find a genetic counselor

Discuss inherited mutation risk, family history, and genetic testing options.

Find an oncology social worker

Access emotional counseling, family support groups, and mental health resources.

Find a financial navigator

Locate copay assistance foundations, grant programs, and lodging/travel support.

Find a clinical-trial specialist

Search matching studies and speak with NCI trial information specialists.

Get urgent help

Immediate emergency guidance for fever (>100.4°F during chemo), severe pain, or shortness of breath.

Help Us Improve This Guide

Did this explanation answer your question and help you determine your next step?

Know someone who needs this?

Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.

Email itText itWhatsApp

Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.

Knowledge Check

0 of 3 answered

  1. Q1.Is laetrile a vitamin?
  2. Q2.What safety concern is linked to laetrile?
  3. Q3.What do studies show about laetrile and cancer?

This self-assessment checks understanding of educational content only. It is not medical advice.

Plain-language explanation of the published sources cited on this page. AI-assisted, source-checked, not clinician-reviewed.

Sources last checked: 2026-07-13 what this meansLast updated: 2026-08-06Next planned review: 2027-01-13

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes. We do not employ clinicians and do not intend to — our work is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status — Editorial review complete. This page completed Cancer Explained's editorial checks (sources, safety, plain language, duplication). It has not been reviewed by a physician or other healthcare professional.

General education — varies by person. Answers genuinely differ between people. This page explains what commonly varies and points you to your care team for your situation.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Our editorial processHow we use AIReport an error

How this page was created

Cancer Explained does not originate medical claims. Every page restates guidance already published by the National Cancer Institute, the CDC, the USPSTF and the FDA, in plain language, with the source cited so you can check the original yourself. AI does the translating and organizing; automated checks test claims, citations, clarity and safety before anything publishes. We do not employ clinicians and do not intend to — our work is translation and navigation, not clinical judgment. Nothing here is personal medical advice, and no page can account for your particular situation.

Editorial status: Editorial review complete This page completed Cancer Explained's editorial checks (sources, safety, plain language, duplication). It has not been reviewed by a physician or other healthcare professional.

Human medical review: not completed. Pages here are not signed off by a clinician before they publish. That is not an oversight we are quietly working around: we restate published guidance and cite it, so the authority belongs to the source rather than to us, and every page names where its claims come from — you can verify us instead of trusting us. Where a volunteer clinician has reviewed a page, their name and credentials appear on it; where no name appears, no clinician has checked it. We are glad to have reviewers and are recruiting them, and we do not hold pages back waiting for one. Use this site to understand your situation and to ask better questions of the people treating you.

Read more about our editorial process, our use of AI, and our corrections policy.

Spotted a problem? Report an error — a factual mistake, broken or outdated source, confusing wording, or anything that seems unsafe. Please do not include names, medical record numbers, dates of birth, addresses, or other identifying medical information in your report.

After using this page, do you understand what to do next?

Anonymous — we only record the answer, never who gave it.