NewsTrending topic
IARC classifies processed meat as carcinogenic to humans
IARC classifies processed meat as carcinogenic to humans (International, 2015). What changed, who is affected, and what it does and doesn't mean.
Original commentary from the Cancer Explained editorial team.

Please note: this page is educational only — it is not medical advice, and it does not speculate about anyone’s health beyond reliable public reporting. For questions about your own health, talk with your healthcare team.
The finding, in one sentence
On 26 October 2015 the International Agency for Research on Cancer put processed meat in Group 1: carcinogenic to humans. IARC is the cancer agency of the World Health Organization. A working group of 22 experts from 10 countries made the call after reviewing more than 800 studies.
The reason given was narrow and specific. There was sufficient evidence in humans that eating processed meat causes colorectal cancer.
Red meat came out differently. It went into Group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans, on limited human evidence plus strong laboratory evidence. The link there was also mainly colorectal, with weaker signals for pancreatic and prostate cancer.
What a Group 1 label actually measures
This is where the 2015 coverage went wrong, and it is worth being blunt about.
Group 1 also contains tobacco smoking and asbestos. That does not put a bacon sandwich alongside a cigarette.
IARC says so directly. Its classifications describe how strong the scientific evidence is that something can cause cancer. They do not measure how much cancer it causes. Two agents can sit in the same group with wildly different risks attached.
Think of it as a verdict on the evidence, not a score on the danger.
The 18 percent, translated
IARC reported that each 50 gram portion of processed meat eaten daily raises the risk of colorectal cancer by 18 percent.
That number is a relative increase. It scales whatever your own baseline risk already is. It is not an 18 percent chance of getting bowel cancer.
Kurt Straif, then head of the IARC Monographs Programme, put it this way in the agency's press release: for an individual, the risk of developing colorectal cancer because of processed meat remains small, but it increases with the amount eaten.
The scale shows up at the population level instead. WHO cites the Global Burden of Disease Project, an independent academic group, which estimates about 34,000 cancer deaths a year worldwide are attributable to diets high in processed meat. Our page on processed meat and colorectal cancer risk works through what that means for a weekly shop.
What counts as processed meat
IARC defines it as meat changed by salting, curing, fermentation, smoking, or other processes that add flavor or improve preservation.
The examples IARC gives are hot dogs, ham, sausages, corned beef, and biltong or beef jerky, plus canned meat and meat-based sauces. Most contain pork or beef, but processed meat can also include poultry, offal, or blood.
Red meat means mammalian muscle meat: beef, veal, pork, lamb, mutton, horse and goat.
Fresh chicken breast is neither. Neither is fish.
When to get checked
Diet is a long game. Symptoms and screening are the short one.
NCI lists these as possible signs of colon cancer, and notes that other conditions cause them too:
- Blood in the stool, either bright red or very dark
- A change in bowel habits
- Diarrhea or constipation
- A feeling that the bowel does not empty completely
- Stools narrower or differently shaped than usual
- Abdominal discomfort, gas pains, bloating, fullness or cramps
- Weight loss with no known cause
- Fatigue
- Vomiting
Screening has firmer numbers. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends colorectal cancer screening for all adults aged 50 to 75, a grade A recommendation. It also recommends screening adults aged 45 to 49, a grade B. For ages 76 to 85 it says clinicians should offer screening selectively, weighing overall health and past screening.
Screening tests NCI lists include fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, virtual colonoscopy and DNA stool tests. Our page on colorectal cancer screening compares what each one involves.
The reason screening beats symptoms is that colorectal cancer often starts as a polyp, a small growth on the bowel lining. Polyps found during a colonoscopy can be removed on the spot, before any cancer forms.
Why any of this matters at scale
SEER, NCI's cancer surveillance program, publishes the American Cancer Society's projection of 158,850 new US colorectal cancer cases and 55,230 deaths for 2026. It is the second leading cause of cancer death in the country. Median age at diagnosis, from NCI's own records, is 66.
Five-year relative survival is 65.4 percent overall for cases from 2016 to 2022. By stage: 91.3 percent while the cancer stays in the bowel wall, 75.2 percent once regional lymph nodes are involved, 16.9 percent with distant spread. Thirty-four percent are caught localized; 23 percent are already distant.
Those figures are group averages across a registry population, and they describe no individual. What they do show is why a modest shift in a common exposure still matters. Our page on colorectal cancer risk factors sets diet next to the other things that move that risk.
What this does not mean
It does not mean processed meat is as dangerous as smoking. WHO says this in as many words.
It does not mean any single meal caused any single cancer. The finding is statistical, drawn mostly from large prospective studies that followed people for years.
It does not mean red meat has been established as a cause of cancer. IARC put it one rung down, at probably carcinogenic, and WHO notes the evidence there is not conclusive.
It is not a law or a regulation. IARC issues scientific classifications. What governments do with them is a separate step, and IARC's own director framed the 2015 result as input for risk assessments that balance risks against the nutritional value of red meat.
And it says nothing about how much anyone should eat. That is a judgment about a whole diet, and it belongs with a clinician or a dietitian who knows the rest of the picture.
Sources
- IARC Press Release N° 240, IARC Monographs evaluate consumption of red meat and processed meat, 26 October 2015 — https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr240_E.pdf
- IARC, Monographs Volume 114: evaluation of consumption of red meat and processed meat — https://www.iarc.who.int/featured-news/media-centre-iarc-news-redmeat/
- WHO, Q&A on the carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat — https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat
- NCI PDQ, Colon Cancer Treatment (Patient Version) — https://www.cancer.gov/types/colorectal/patient/colon-treatment-pdq
- US Preventive Services Task Force, Colorectal Cancer: Screening — https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colorectal-cancer-screening
- SEER Cancer Stat Facts, Colorectal Cancer — https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html
How this article was prepared
An AI-assisted editorial system helped prepare this page. No named medical reviewer has reviewed it unless one is listed.
The National Cancer Information Foundation publishes Cancer Explained. This page is for learning. It is not medical advice and does not suggest a test or treatment.
See an error, old source, or unclear wording? Tell us
Know someone who needs this?
Plenty of people are looking for something like this and do not know where to start. If this would help a friend or someone you love, send it on — we have written an opening line so you do not have to stare at an empty message. You can change every word of it.
Your message is written and sent in your own email or messaging app — we never see who you send it to, and nothing is added to any list.
Put the story in context
Prevention, possible warning signs, screening, and diagnosis
This story relates to Colorectal cancer. The information below is general: it does not reveal anything else about a public person’s health, and not every point applies to every cancer. Personal advice depends on age, symptoms, family history, exposures, and medical history.
Prevention and risk reduction
Not every cancer can be prevented. Avoiding tobacco, protecting skin from ultraviolet radiation, limiting alcohol, staying active, and receiving recommended HPV or hepatitis B vaccination can lower the risk of certain cancers. A risk factor is not a prediction or a cause in one individual.
Symptoms and possible early signs
Possible signs vary and are often caused by conditions other than cancer. Changes worth discussing include a new lump, unexplained bleeding or weight loss, a persistent cough, lasting bowel or bladder changes, a changing skin spot, or symptoms that persist or worsen. Some early cancers cause no symptoms.
Screening and early detection
Screening looks for certain cancers before symptoms begin. Recommended tests exist only for some cancers and depend on age and risk. Screening can have benefits and harms; it is not the same as evaluating a new symptom, and there is no single routine scan or blood test that reliably screens for every cancer.
How cancer is diagnosed
Diagnosis may involve a history and exam, imaging, laboratory tests, and often a biopsy. Pathology can identify the cancer type and may test biomarkers that guide treatment. Symptoms, screening results, tumor markers, or online stories alone cannot confirm cancer.
Learn about this story’s cancer topic
A public story may encourage questions, but it should not be used to estimate your risk or choose testing. Contact a healthcare professional about a persistent or concerning change. Seek urgent care for severe or rapidly worsening symptoms.